 ADF Agricultural Development Foundation
| Press the browser Back button to return |
Briefs, Glossary & Notes
PLEASE NOTE - THIS SECTION IS SUBJECT TO CONSTANT REVISION
AFA
AFA-Agrárfejlesztesi Alapitvány is the Hungarian Agricultural Development Foundation.
To return to the original text - press your browser's Back button...
the best
What is deemed best depends upon the views of project participants.
Best can be judged from the standpoint of minimisation of costs, the
maximisation of profit, the most-ecologically sustainable, the least
demanding on some resource, the easiest to manage, quickest to pay off,
lowest financial risk, the latest technology, creator of most jobs and
other criteria. Under normal circumstances project designers attempt to
optimize a proposal in order to trade off such criteria to arrive at an
acceptable compromise.
To return to the original text - press your browser's Back button...
extension services
Extension
work has an important role in helping spread innovation and
contributing to the growth in the rural economy. Extension services are
normally advisory and provide technical, economics and financial advice
to farmers and rural communities of options for achieving an objective
such as crop production, animal production, post harvest activities and
rural pursuits.
Extension service practitioners (extensionists) need to maintain a
detached approach to their work by setting out, for their rural
clients, options and alternatives for tackling any particular issue.
The final decision on the pathway taken should always rest with the
client. Extensionists, in preparing for and undertaking their work,
need to be well informed so that they are capable of presenting to
clients the full range of available options as opposed to those
understood or favoured by the extensionist.
One
of the roles of an extensionist is that of a promoting an appreciation
of the benefits and requirements for achieving improved practice.
Extension work is often a one-on-one communications affair where the
extensionist is in a better position to judge whether or not what is
being said is being understood.
Overall, in the past, extension services have tended to emphasize
technical aspects of crop and animal husbandry at the expense of
fundamental economic and financial issues. To some extent this is a
natural consequence of different extensionists having specialised in
different aspects of agricultural production. The best way to advance
the appreciation of economics and financial dimensions is a systems
approach where agricultural economists review technical advances with
their 'technical' colleagues to assess the economic and financial
implications of changes in any given technology and associated
technique.
To return to the original text - press your browser's Back button...
governmental cycles
Throughout most of the, so-called, democratic countries, governments
are required to be re-elected every 4 to 5 years. Normally a new
government will 'review policy' in the first year of office, it
normally begins to implement policy during the subsequent two years. As
the next election appears over the horizon, politician's invariably
allow this to distract their attention towards election winning actions
as opposed to managing on-going policy issues. In practical terms there
is a 'governmental cycle' of 2 years of lack of definition and action
and a frenzy of activity of 2 years in the middle. Almost 50% of the
time is inaction. In such a roller-coaster environment politicians tend
to pay attention to what is 'important' (to them) and it becomes very
difficult for small rural communities, low income groups and farmer
groups, with important concerns, to begin a useful dialogue, let alone
maintain a sustained dialogue with government. Such a continuity is
almost impossible because the people concerned are moving, most of the
time. Indeed, this dynamics can be convenient to those who in fact are
not interested in such issues. Such 'awkward' issues can be
conveniently abandoned by governments with 'the coming election' being
the excuse.
To return to the original text - press your browser's Back button...
project ownership
The term project ownership combines several important factors all of which contribute to the likelihood of a project succeeding.
Understanding
If people do not understand fully what a project is trying to
achieve, and why, it is unlikely that they will show any enthusiasm for
the project at all, let alone become involved.
The best way for
people to understand what a project is about is for them to have been
involved in the preparatory work which led to is conception and final
design. This way people have a clearer understanding of why the project
has been developed and know whether the project is important to them as
individuals, as a family or community.
Participation
If the preparatory and development phases
of projects involve an adequate level of participation of individuals
from a community, then it is possible to achieve an adequate level of
information flow and a broader understanding of a project within the
community; people talk. Even better, if a participatory forum, made up
of members of the local community, and with appropriate independent
advice on specialised issues, then the conception of the 'need' for a
project, or projects, becomes a community issue, the community gains
ownership. Just as important, people will better understand why other
approaches have been rejected.
With ownership comes commitment and a broader desire within a community
for selected projects to succeed, people will help out and pass on the
word.
Its their's not yours...
Those providing advice to participatory forums need to maintain a
detached position. They need to avoid taking up a leading role in any
forum discussions. It is important not to 'slip in' a 'top down'
approach when working at the grass roots (the source of bottom up
initiatives). Project ownership needs to be genuine. The role of the
extensionist or practitioner, assisting such forums is to act as a
catalyst and provider of sound information. They need to put any
professional pride aside and suppress ego to the extent of being able
to become totally committed to ensuring that their project becomes the best feasible in the given circumstances.
To return to the original text - press your browser's Back button...
participatory development
Participatory
development is more a concept than a reality in many rural regions of
the world, including high income countries and democracies.
Participatory development is a process whereby a group of people
collaborate to work out a solution to a common problem. The idea behind
participatory development is to have each individual with an interest
in what is being discussed, the opportunity, not only to have his or
her views known, but to also work with the others, as a team, to bring
about changes identified and desired by the group.
There is a common confusion made between participatory development and
democratic process. It is often assumed that democracies are in fact a
participatory developmental structure. They are not. All democracies
have a long way to go before they achieve the levels of participation
necessary for participatory development. In order to appreciate the
difference, those who form a forum for participatory development,
remain in control of the whole process from conception through to
implementation if they want. The group can control the speed of
progress because the group genuinely remains responsible for this
progress. This level of participation stands in stark contrast to the
normal levels of 'participation' in democracies. Voters have a fleeting
sense of 'control' when they cast their vote in an election. But by the
time government is formed, it has reviewed issues related to a group's
interests and has fashioned policy, one soon sees how far removed
central goverment 'one-size-fits-all projects' are from the specific
and varied needs of different communities.
To return to the original text - press your browser's Back button...
RAGs - rural action groups
RAGs are organisations, normally non-governmental and non-profit, which
provide a focus for participatory development for local communities.
RAGs allow anyone within a community to raise a development issue and
request the organization of a forum to review needs and possibilities
of developing solutions. In the case of low income communities RAGs are
an important positive catalyst for the most excluded members because
they are there to serve everyone. RAGS are based upon informal contacts
and there is normally no institutional formalism which acts as a
'social incentive' for many not be even approach some development
agencies. RAGs are people talking to people and an empowerment of
people born of an absense of institutional hierarchy. RAGs tend to have
none of the protocols and etiquettes which characterize the public
interfaces of larger development agencies which help stifle the
willingness of those, most in need, to approach them.
RAGs are often regarded with suspicion by local politicians since they
see any group action as political action and if they are not involved,
then as a potential rival action to their party activities. A strength
of RAGs is their apolitical nature. By not representing political
factions they remain approachable by everyone and therefore have an
important catalytic role in encouraging local initiative.Because RAGs
work towards the identification of rational projects, and even
policies, for local communities, any local politicians who want to help
their local communities would be better served by their encouraging the
operation of RAGs. This way they can ensure that better project and
policy proposals are produced than would be possible without the
participatory development process used by RAGs.
To return to the original text - press your browser's Back button...
project resources
Project resources are the things required to implement a project and include some or all of the following:
- people
- machines & equipment
- fuel and energy
- land
- buildings
- consumable inputs
- time to undertake each stage of development
- sound information
- funding to purchase or lease the above resources
- an adequate appreciation (information and analysis) of the effect of the community location with respect to the market
To return to the original text - press your browser's Back button...
Romungro
The Romungro are
Roma who have been established in Hungary for well over 500 years. As a
result of decrees of the Austrian ruler (Maria Teresa) they were
declared the 'new Hungarians' and banned from speaking their native
language, Romani. As a result the majority of Romungro do not speak
Romani and only speak Hungarian. The Romungro make up some 75%-80% of
the Romani population in Hungary and constitute the poorest segment of
urban and rural communities. There are at least 800,000 Romungro in
Hungary with large segments not being identified as Romungro or even
Roma.
As a result of the Trianon 'settlement' after the first world war,
Hungary was split into different territories leaving a significant
number of Romungro in Slovakia, Romania and other countries. The
numbers of Romungro living outside Hungary are estimated at around
600,000.
They have faced extensive racial discrimination with most rural
Romungro children attending 'special schools'. This is a result of a
distorted financial incentive provided by central government. This
provides local authorities generous grants, from the central budget,
according to the number of children classified as requiring 'special
education'. This has led to local authorities exaggerating special
school populations by channeling Roma children into such schools so as
to gain more funds from central budget. European Union, and other,
educational experts have evaluated Romani children in special schools
and have found them to have equivalent intelligence and educational
potential to normal Hungarian children attending 'normal schools'.
Unfortunately the funds received are not spent on the special schools,
nor the Romani children, but go either to the 'normal school' or
'elsewhere'. The special schools are ineffective and Romani children
are not encouraged, they lose interest, languish and 'drop out'.
So
the commodity used, by local authorites, to bolster their financial
reseves is the future of Romani children. This practice has been in
effect for over 50 years. Because of this, the majority of all
generations of Romungro lack effective schooling and training as a
direct result of institutional racial discrimination on the part of the
past Communist and current 'democractic' and 'market orientated'
governments alike.
|
|